Trump wants to fix the 14th

EC

12 pointer
Jul 13, 2003
13,646
Louisville, KY.
Russian women are coming here a week or two on vacation just to have their child born in USA

The Chinese have been doing this for sometime...because as I understand...they get to have their kids free...if they put on the "I so poor" act. Of course, these women are loaded to begin with.

I'm so sick of the US playing the fool. And these subversives want this to continue because the idea is to destroy the US economically. Break the bank...and you'll submit to anything to be rescued (from the Hell they've intentionally created). Cloward-Piven strategy.
 

ojibwa62

12 pointer
Jul 1, 2018
10,528
NOTW
The Chinese have been doing this for sometime...because as I understand...they get to have their kids free...if they put on the "I so poor" act. Of course, these women are loaded to begin with.

I'm so sick of the US playing the fool. And these subversives want this to continue because the idea is to destroy the US economically. Break the bank...and you'll submit to anything to be rescued (from the Hell they've intentionally created). Cloward-Piven strategy.
We need to stop being the world's police force and nanny.
 
  • Like
Reactions: EC

High Rack

12 pointer
Dec 21, 2009
6,269
in the hills
No POTUS has the power through an EO to “create law”. Trump can’t change the 14th Amendment legally. That doesn’t mean I don’t agree with the original intent, just that alone, IMO he has zero constitutional power to do anything. Yes, I understand it has been a policy enforcement issue, but one based on a literal translation of the Constitution, unlike the “Dream Act” bs.

Frankly, he needs to leave it alone. If we, as conservative supporters of the constitution want the second to be interpreted as it’s written, then we need to leave the 14th alone. Kids being born to illegal immigrants is not the biggest problem.
I disagree this is not a big problem. 22million illegals having 3-400k babies a year is a problem, a big one when you consider the resources that are taken away from American kids that need it, not to mention the ability to vouch for there parents at age 21, then comes the extended family BS.
I am not worried about the 2nd, it has been to SCOTUS a few rounds and survived, the 14th has never been pushed to that level, and I would like to see where this can go because I think Trump is spot on, and could make the dreamer issue a moot one.
 

Iceman35

12 pointer
Oct 27, 2008
7,987
Boone County
I disagree this is not a big problem. 22million illegals having 3-400k babies a year is a problem, a big one when you consider the resources that are taken away from American kids that need it, not to mention the ability to vouch for there parents at age 21, then comes the extended family BS.
I am not worried about the 2nd, it has been to SCOTUS a few rounds and survived, the 14th has never been pushed to that level, and I would like to see where this can go because I think Trump is spot on, and could make the dreamer issue a moot one.
Agree it’s a big problem, just not the biggest. Stop the illegal immigration at the border, per the existing law, and you won’t have to worry about the kids being born.

I agree that the 14th has never been challenged at the SCOTUS, however, I believe if Trump pushes the issue it will head that direction. I’m simply saying, if we want the 2nd to be translated literally, then we have to accept the other amendments literally as well.
 

Gforcetrivers

12 pointer
Sep 23, 2016
3,980
Burkesville
This is pulled from a Reuters article that sited a "Future" Right to Migration. This is what the Democrats are doing with open borders. The Austrians see whats going on and Trump is ahead of the game as well. Lots of people that think they should be able go anywhere in the world that want!

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-...ring-creep-in-human-rights-idUSKCN1N50JZ?il=0

The Austrian government is concerned that signing up to the pact, even though it is not binding, could eventually help lead to the recognition of a “human right to migration”. The text of a cabinet decision formally approving its move on Wednesday said it would argue against such a right.

“We reject any movement in that direction,” Freedom Party leader and Vice Chancellor Heinz-Christian Strache told a news conference after the weekly cabinet meeting.
 


Top